🔗 Share this article

They call themselves as the "salvage squad". Following being let go when foreign assistance faced cuts in the past months, a collective of devoted staff opted to create their own rescue package.

Choosing not to "wallow in misery", a former economist, along with similarly motivated former agency staff, began efforts to save some of the essential programmes that were at risk after the reductions.

At present, nearly eighty projects have been preserved by a matchmaking service managed by Rosenbaum and additional ex- aid staff, which has secured them more than $110 million in recent backing. The team behind the Project Resource Optimization effort calculates it will benefit forty million people, covering many young kids.

After the termination of operations, spending was frozen, a large workforce was let go, and projects worldwide either ended suddenly or were left limping toward what Rosenbaum calls "termination points".

The former staffer and a few co-workers were contacted by a charitable entity that "aimed to figure out how they could make the best use of their finite budgets".

They built a selection from the cancelled projects, identifying those "delivering the most critical assistance per dollar" and where a alternative supporter could practically intervene and continue the work.

They soon understood the demand was more extensive than that original organization and started to contact further funding sources.

"We dubbed ourselves the lifeboat crew at the beginning," states Rosenbaum. "The organization has been collapsing, and there aren't enough emergency options for every project to be saved, and so we're striving to actually protect as many infants as we can, secure spots for these support channels as feasible, via the programmes that are providing support."

The project, now functioning as part of a international policy center, has obtained financial support for seventy-nine initiatives on its list in over thirty countries. Several have had initial backing restored. A number were could not be preserved in time.

Backing has originated from a combination of philanthropic foundations and wealthy individuals. Most choose to be unidentified.

"The supporters originate from varied motivations and viewpoints, but the common thread that we've received from them is, 'I am appalled by what's unfolding. I truly desire to discover an approach to help,'" notes the economist.

"I think that there was an 'aha moment' for the entire team as we started working on this, that this provided an opportunity to transition from the ice-cream on the couch, dwelling on the gloom of everything that was happening around us, to having a meaningful task to really sink our teeth into."

An example programme that has secured backing through Pro is work by the Alliance for International Medical Action to provide services encompassing nutritional rehabilitation, maternal health care and essential immunizations for kids in Mali.

It is crucial to continue these initiatives, states the economist, not only because restarting operations if they stopped would be prohibitively pricey but also because of how much trust would be lost in the zones of instability if the group pulled out.

"The organization informed us […] 'we're very worried that if we depart, we may lose our place.'"

Projects with future-focused aims, such as improving medical infrastructure, or in other fields such as education, have remained outside the initiative's scope. It also does not seek to save the projects indefinitely but to "create a window for the groups and, frankly, the broader ecosystem, to determine a longer-term solution".

Now that they have obtained support for every initiative on its initial list, Pro states it will now prioritize reaching further populations with "proven, cost-effective interventions".