🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated discussions in the legislature.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in Riga this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, mandating authorities to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all types of violence.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have contended that its focus on gender equality undermines family values and advances what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Saeima, MPs decided by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who stood with demonstrators outside parliament earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the exit is Latvia First, whose head has urged citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "gender ideology with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the organization the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked widespread protest both inside the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand individuals have signed a Latvian petition demanding the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a demonstration for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying regression for female equality and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation abandoned the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional principles, "taking into account governmental and judicial factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Recently, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a concerning situation for women's rights not only in our nation but throughout the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable discussions in additional member states